VS   

By now, I'm sure you're all aware that Windows Vista, Microsoft's latest operating system is taking the world with a lot of criticism, and with Windows XP's end of life fast approaching at the end of June, many people may very well be in a dilemma on what to do.

First things first, Windows XP's end of life is June 30, 2008, less than 2 months away. What this means is that vendors are no longer supposed to sell Windows XP either standalone versions, or bundled OEM versions. Although there are a few exceptions to this, namely the budget laptops, but for all intents and purposes, the June 30^th date holds. Windows XP, compared to Vista requires far less system requirements to run so older computers normally will have no problem running the XP operating system. This in itself is what leads to the dilemma. People with older machines may want to upgrade their computer and may not want to spend the extra money for a computer that can truly handle the lofty Vista requirements. This can be particularly problematic for the current high school seniors who are heading out to college in August and September who will be buying new computers. Do you buy the computer now so you can get XP with it, do you suck it up and just deal with Vista on a computer that may not be truly able to handle it, or do you buy a standalone copy of XP and just wipe the Vista install on the new computer. None of the options are incredibly pretty. A lot of computer companies have deals late July and early August for the "going away to college" crowd which can save a fair amount of money, but this would be after the June 30th cut-off. Buying the computer now, should still allow for the purchasing of a computer with XP, but the price savings wouldn't be there. And of course buying XP now and installing it later on the new computer bundled with Vista would probably negate most of the savings since you'd pretty much be buying 2 operating systems and only using the one.

Despite all my criticisms of Vista, I have since installed it on my desktop and I don't hate it as much as I used to, especially after turning off the damned UAC. Vista for me has been running smoothly, some of the new UI features are actually pretty nice, but my desktop computer is for all intents and purposes, different from the norm. My desktop is not the run-of the-mill basic computer, it is relatively powerful and rates a 5.6 on Vista's hardware rating. Most basic laptops and desktops you would buy from companies like Dell are not specced nearly has high as my Desktop so they wouldn't be able to run Vista nearly as well as I can. And this is where my criticism of Vista really is rooted. Vista's system requirements are too high for an operating system. XP has a relatively good balance between minimum requirements and the computers capable of running it (at least as far as Windows goes). And it's because of this that consumers might find it tricky to figure out what they want to do about future desktop purchases and if they want to give Vista a shot or not.

A few things to note are that Windows XP SP3 support continues til 2014 so software updates will still be available to you after June 30, 2008. Another note is that Dell has mentioned that they plan to continue to sell XP even after the end of life date passes. Whether this means that Microsoft may again extend the June 30 cut-off or if Microsoft will put a stop to Dell's plans remains uncertain.

Of course Windows XP and Vista are not the only choices people have for new computers. Apple computers are growing in popularity and rightfully so. Macs have become solid machines of late and their OS X operating system is definitely a good alternative to Windows, and something I would personally reccommend. Another choice of course is Linux, particularly Ubuntu which in my opinion is a friendly Linux Distribution for someone new. In fact, Dell actually sells machines pre-installed with Ubuntu. You can check out these hints if you're trying to get someone to switch over to Linux.

Tags: microsoft, windows, vista, xp

Rumor has it that Windows XP SP3 will be getting released this week. For all of those who prefer sticking with Windows XP over the blighted Windows Vista, keep your eyes out for the last service pack on Microsoft Update.

Engadget is however reporting that there might be a show-stopping stability problem in SP3 which could prevent its rollout. In any case, keep your eyes peeled for its release should it get rolled out anyway. This does lead to the question, "should you upgrade to SP3 right away?" The choice is yours but with this reported issue, it might be wise to wait a couple days to see if any major problems are being commonly reported.

Windows XP's end of life is fast approaching, with sales slated to end this June. Service Pack 3 is set to be the last major service pack for the still popular XP Operating System.

Update: It looks like SP3 is now being prepared for release next month, so an update this week seems unlikely, although SP3 Release Candidate 2 is now available for the public so if you're brave enough you can get Microsoft Update to install it.

Tags: microsoft, windowsxp, sp3

First off, I want to preface this with the fact that the current build of Microsoft Internet Explorer is still in beta, so any issues I have found could very well be caused by the instabilities inherent with beta software.

Okay, now that that's done with, on to the good (or bad) parts. When I first heard that IE8 was going to be standards compliant I was impressed with Microsoft for actually doing something that myself, and I'm sure many others have wanted for some time now. Am I right? When the first beta was released, I decided to give it a try figuring I had nothing to lose by trying it out.

The first thing I was curious about, and rightfully so, is how does my website look under IE8 in "standards compliant" mode? I figured, "hey, my website looks fine in Safari, Firefox, Opera, even IE7, so this should be fine." Yeah, easier thought than to believe. In the default setting in IE8, the title looks like this:

Now this could very well me making a mistake in my HTML/CSS coding, I'm not the most experienced HTML/CSS coder out there and I know that, but then why does my site look normal, or should I say, like it's supposed to, how I want it to in every other browser I tested it in (IE7, Safari, Firefox, Opera, & Konquerer). It's just a table aligned to have both my picture and title text below the upper blue line. If anyone has any idea as to why its doing that and wants to give me a hint, please let me know, I'll be thankful.

One nice feature that IE8 has is particularly nice for developers. IE8 has the ability to emulate IE7 rendering. So for those wanting to see how the page would look like in IE7 need only press a button to go into IE7 emulation mode.

When you click this, IE is going to prompt you to restart Internet Explorer for the changes to go into effect.

This kind of surprised me as I was figuring that all it would really require to make the switch to IE7 emulation mode would be a page refresh. It's kind of annoying to have to restart IE to switch display modes (you do have to restart again to switch back). But I will say that I'm probably just nitpicking right now. I did notice that the switch often times did cause IE8 to crash, but I can attribute that to it only being a beta so I won't hold it against IE8...yet.

So now I'm in IE7 emulation mode, so I navigate back to my page to see how it looks with this mode. What do you know, just like in IE7, it shows up the way its supposed to.

Again, I could very well be doing something wrong so I can't hold this too much against IE8, but it just strikes me as odd that everything renders fine in the other browsers. And again, if you have any ideas, please let me know. I have noticed other minor oddities in other websites in terms of alignment, but nothing too major.

Another thing I was curious about was how Internet Explorer 8 did with system resources. With 1 tab open and at my site, resources did seem a bit heavy for what my site is, but not too out of the ordinary:

With 4 tabs open (my site, Digg, Mixx, and Space.com), the memory and VM usage went up considerably:

From what I remember checking before with IE7, it does seem a bit better, but with Firefox 2 clocking in with 65MB of memory usage with 47MB in virtual memory, IE7 and 8 are both considerably higher. But I will say its a step in the right direction and who knows, maybe the final release will be even better. One can only hope.

One thing Microsoft seems to be getting more into is social networking. The What's New in Internet Explorer 8 page lists Facebook, StumbleUpon, and Windows Live as "cool" places to get started at. There's a page menu that will even allow you to translate a page, send a page to a friend, and blog, all of course with Windows Live tools.

It also includes the standard options you'd see in other browsers as well. Wait, what the hell is Windows Live? It's still around? Does anyone actually use it? Okay, I apologize for that, I just never really saw that much potential in Windows Live, and with Google's Blogger, guess I'm just surprised people don't used Blogger, which I personally feel is a pretty decent platform for those who just want to blog and not have to worry so much about maintaining their own site. But at the same time I guess, setting it as the default option will get plenty of basic users to join as they may not know about other options, anyway, I digress.

In short, while except for my issue with my website and HTML/CSS rendering, I did see some slight improvements over IE7, overall, there's really not much that has changed. The UI is basically the same minus a few extra buttons:

(Click to view larger)

And it really just doesn't bring anything to the table to make it stand out over my preferred browsers, Safari and Firefox. Personally, I'd say that if you're a Firefox, Opera, or Safari user, you're fine where you are now. What I see so far brings me no closer to switching back to Internet Explorer as my primary browser, and not to sound too much like a Microsoft hater, IE8 beta 1 does not impress me at all really, and I don't see anything that the final release could possibly bring to make me change my mind on that.

So would you even consider going back to IE, or are you now enjoying the web with one of the other browsers?

Tags: reviews, thoughts, microsoft, internetexplorer, web