VS   

By now, I'm sure you're all aware that Windows Vista, Microsoft's latest operating system is taking the world with a lot of criticism, and with Windows XP's end of life fast approaching at the end of June, many people may very well be in a dilemma on what to do.

First things first, Windows XP's end of life is June 30, 2008, less than 2 months away. What this means is that vendors are no longer supposed to sell Windows XP either standalone versions, or bundled OEM versions. Although there are a few exceptions to this, namely the budget laptops, but for all intents and purposes, the June 30^th date holds. Windows XP, compared to Vista requires far less system requirements to run so older computers normally will have no problem running the XP operating system. This in itself is what leads to the dilemma. People with older machines may want to upgrade their computer and may not want to spend the extra money for a computer that can truly handle the lofty Vista requirements. This can be particularly problematic for the current high school seniors who are heading out to college in August and September who will be buying new computers. Do you buy the computer now so you can get XP with it, do you suck it up and just deal with Vista on a computer that may not be truly able to handle it, or do you buy a standalone copy of XP and just wipe the Vista install on the new computer. None of the options are incredibly pretty. A lot of computer companies have deals late July and early August for the "going away to college" crowd which can save a fair amount of money, but this would be after the June 30th cut-off. Buying the computer now, should still allow for the purchasing of a computer with XP, but the price savings wouldn't be there. And of course buying XP now and installing it later on the new computer bundled with Vista would probably negate most of the savings since you'd pretty much be buying 2 operating systems and only using the one.

Despite all my criticisms of Vista, I have since installed it on my desktop and I don't hate it as much as I used to, especially after turning off the damned UAC. Vista for me has been running smoothly, some of the new UI features are actually pretty nice, but my desktop computer is for all intents and purposes, different from the norm. My desktop is not the run-of the-mill basic computer, it is relatively powerful and rates a 5.6 on Vista's hardware rating. Most basic laptops and desktops you would buy from companies like Dell are not specced nearly has high as my Desktop so they wouldn't be able to run Vista nearly as well as I can. And this is where my criticism of Vista really is rooted. Vista's system requirements are too high for an operating system. XP has a relatively good balance between minimum requirements and the computers capable of running it (at least as far as Windows goes). And it's because of this that consumers might find it tricky to figure out what they want to do about future desktop purchases and if they want to give Vista a shot or not.

A few things to note are that Windows XP SP3 support continues til 2014 so software updates will still be available to you after June 30, 2008. Another note is that Dell has mentioned that they plan to continue to sell XP even after the end of life date passes. Whether this means that Microsoft may again extend the June 30 cut-off or if Microsoft will put a stop to Dell's plans remains uncertain.

Of course Windows XP and Vista are not the only choices people have for new computers. Apple computers are growing in popularity and rightfully so. Macs have become solid machines of late and their OS X operating system is definitely a good alternative to Windows, and something I would personally reccommend. Another choice of course is Linux, particularly Ubuntu which in my opinion is a friendly Linux Distribution for someone new. In fact, Dell actually sells machines pre-installed with Ubuntu. You can check out these hints if you're trying to get someone to switch over to Linux.

Tags: microsoft, windows, vista, xp

Some of those that know me could possibly call me a fanboy of both Apple, Linux, or the XBOX (yes, I know the last one is almost a contradiction in terms since its made by Microsoft and I tend to favor Microsoft's competition over its Windows OS). I however take a different stand. I don't consider myself a fanboy of Apple, Linux, or XBOX. Yes, I love my Mac, my iPod, my iPhone, my Linux server, and my XBOX 360, but does preferring one platform over another really make you a fanboy?

So this leads me to my question: What exactly constitutes a fanboy?

I've heard some people say that if you prefer company A's product over company B's, then you are a Company A fanboy. I don't believe this is true. To be a fanboy in my opinion, you must love a product so much that you will jump on any opportunity to badmouth any competition, ignoring anything that the competition might actually be doing better than your product. Fanboys tend to be relatively close-minded on issues surrounding whatever it is that their product or company is involved in. We'll take the gaming consoles for the example. A Microsoft XBOX fanboy would be so into the XBOX that he would be blind and try to find a negative spin on anything that Sony or Nintendo might come out with for the PS3 or Wii, even if what Nintendo or Sony does is better than how Microsoft happens to do it for the 360.

I'll say it first, being ignorant goes nowhere, and fanboism is no exception. Take me for example, I much prefer OS X over Windows, hands down, no second guessing with pretty much no competition. Do I hate Windows? Do I hate Microsoft? No, I don't. I don't like some of the things Microsoft does, I don't like some of the ways Windows does what it does, but that doesn't mean I hate them. And even though I love OS X, I still dislike some of Apple's practices. And this is pretty much the core reason why I don't consider myself a fanboy. I recognize Windows strengths, despite my fondness towards both of it's competitors, OS X and Linux. And the same goes towards Sony's PS3 and Nintendo's Wii compared to my preferred console, the XBOX 360. In the end competition is what drives markets, and operating systems and gaming consoles are no exception. Without competition, there would be less motivation for companies to improve upon their product lines. Can you imagine still working on machines with Windows 98 if Linux or Mac weren't around and Microsoft was less motivated to come up with something new? I'm sure that's an extreme situation that probably wouldn't have happened, but competition drives innovation and innovation leads to improvements. So the next time you immediately want to bash a competing site, product, or company, look at it and see what it is all about. Don't just jump to conclusions and bash it blindly. It may be competing with your sacred product, but it may have its own strengths, and in a roundabout way, may very well lead to improvements for your side of the fence.

Tags: xbox, microsoft, fanboys, apple, linux, ps3

Microsoft today just announced that they will be releasing their latest version of Office for Linux operating systems. Microsoft, probably scared about OpenOffice's rise in popularity among open source advocates decided it was in their best interest to release a version that could run on Linux and presumably BSD. Microsoft is labeling this version of Office "Microsoft Office 2008 Linux Edition". It will have most of the features that Office 2007 and the OS X version, Office 2008 including the ability to read and write the .docx format. Also included is Outlook so Linux users will be able to easily connect to Microsoft Exchange servers.

Microsoft Developer Lirpa Sloof, the lead developer in the move to a Linux version of Office was elated that he could be such a big part of the project.

Despite the fact that I work for Microsoft, and do like the Windows environment, I still like where open source software is heading nowadays and now I'll be able to use Microsoft Office on my Ubuntu Desktop as well.

While there is no definitive pricing information, an insider source has said that Office 2008 Linux Edition will cost $75. Will this be enough to convert people from OpenOffice?

Read about it here.

Tags: microsoft, office, linux, openoffice

Last week I showed you how to set up a home file server using Ubuntu Linux, this week I'll show you how to do the same thing only this time using Microsoft Windows XP.

The first thing you need is to make sure that your system has the minimum system requirements to run XP. They aren't nearly as high as Vista's so you should be okay.

Processor: 300MHz AMD/Intel
Memory: 128MB
Hard Drive: 1.5GB space

Those of course are the minimum requirements, personally I would reccommend the following

Processor: 600MHz AMD/Intel
Memory: 256MB
Hard Drive: 100GB (same as I recommended for Ubuntu for system and storage space)

The first thing to do of course would be to install Windows XP, so put your XP disc into the drive and turn on your PC. After it gets past the BIOS, it should prompt you to press a key to enter setup. So press a key and enter setup.

**Note: If it doesn't prompt you, it probably means its trying to boot off the hard drive first, in which case you need to go into the BIOS and change the boot order. See your motherboard or PC instructions for how to do that on your individual machine.

So go on through the setup and follow the prompts. When it gets to the hard drive partitioning and where to install Windows, set aside 10-20GB for the Windows partition leaving the rest for data storage, we'll set that up later. For the rest of the setup, just follow the prompts as they're presented to you. Make sure to note what you named your computer.

Ok, I'm now going to assume you completed the setup and are now looking at your Windows Desktop.  The first thing you're going to want to do is install Anti-Virus software. If you have your own, go ahead and use that, otherwise feel free to try out ClamWin, its free and pretty good. Make sure to get the latest virus definitions. The next thing to do is to install all of the updates for XP. You can just go to Microsoft Update to do that. Make sure to go there several times and restarts later to make sure you have all the updates. (yes it's annoying but sadly unavoidable)

I'll now assume your computer now has antivirus installed and all the latest updates so we're ready to go. If you right click on My Computer and click Manage, the computer management window pops up.

Click on Disk Management towards the bottom. You'll be presented with the disk management tool.

You should see your C partition and next to it you should see unpartitioned space. (it won't look just like mine so don't worry) You want to right click it and select Format. Create a partition on it taking up all the free space. The partition should be Primary NTFS partition. Let it do its thing and when its done, you should have a new drive letter for the partition.

Ok, now that your data storage partition is all set up, open up My Computer. In the Tools menu at the top, select Folder Options. In the View tab, scroll all the way to the bottom and uncheck Use Simple Sharing. Apply your changes and close the box.

Now go into your data partition and create the folder structure you want to set up. Once you have all the folders created, right click on the folders you want to share and click on Sharing and Security.

Give your share a name. You can give it a comment too if you want, but its not required. Next thing to do is to click the Permissions button.

You can leave Everyone there if you want, just make sure to only give read access. Otherwise just click Everyone and then click Remove. Now you need to add your user. First, click the Add button.

Type in your username and then click OK. Now we want to give your user the ability to write to the share. If you don't need or want this, ignore the following step. Click on your username and click the checkbox Full Control. All the boxes should then be checked under the Allow column, so hit Apply and then OK. Repeat the steps on any other shares you want to make, just make sure you note the share names.

OK, your server is pretty much all set up, all you now need to do is map them on your normal machine. From last week here's the set of instructions.

In windows, go to Start - Run and type in:

\\servername\share

Where servername is the computer's name, which you set during the install process. So for my photo share if I named my server "Darker" then I would enter:

\\darker\photos

This should then ask you for a username and password (the one you set up using the smbpasswd command earlier), or if your windows username and password are the same as the samba username and password you set, then it should just bring up an explorer window with your share. In Windows, you have the option of mapping shares to drives so a share would be given an actual drive letter like a hard drive and DVD drive are given. To do this, right click on My Computer and select 'Map Network Drive'. The following dialog box should come up.

The first field will let you choose which drive letter to assign it to, it doesn't matter so pick one. (it won't let you choose one that's already in use). The second field is where you type in your share name, which we went over in the last paragraph. The final checkbox determines whether the share should connect every time you log in. Since I'm going to assume that you want to be able to access the share all the time, you can just leave it checked. Just click 'Finish'. If it asks for a username and password, then enter it, otherwise it should pop up an explorer window showing the contents of the share.

So there you have it, you now have your very own file server to host your files on. While this may sound obvious to some, in order for people to be able to access the shares you create, you must keep the server turned on.

Again, if you have any questions, comments, need clarification, or have an alternative method, feel free to let me know.

Tags: windows, microsoft, howto, server

Rumor has it that Windows XP SP3 will be getting released this week. For all of those who prefer sticking with Windows XP over the blighted Windows Vista, keep your eyes out for the last service pack on Microsoft Update.

Engadget is however reporting that there might be a show-stopping stability problem in SP3 which could prevent its rollout. In any case, keep your eyes peeled for its release should it get rolled out anyway. This does lead to the question, "should you upgrade to SP3 right away?" The choice is yours but with this reported issue, it might be wise to wait a couple days to see if any major problems are being commonly reported.

Windows XP's end of life is fast approaching, with sales slated to end this June. Service Pack 3 is set to be the last major service pack for the still popular XP Operating System.

Update: It looks like SP3 is now being prepared for release next month, so an update this week seems unlikely, although SP3 Release Candidate 2 is now available for the public so if you're brave enough you can get Microsoft Update to install it.

Tags: microsoft, windowsxp, sp3